Does RealBot "WIP" version have to be open source?

[stefanhendriks]

ow, i see. So it is
to learn
he learnt
he has learned

meaning, learned is the 'completed' stage? learnt is "he just has learnt not/to do that"... right?

[Onno Kreuzinger]

Originally Posted by Mike

uhh.. development versions in general dont have to be supported at all, so this isnt really a reason not to release the source

btw did you read my rant thread in the off-topic forum? it was about the rb homepage

no you are wrong, if a make the binary public i have
a) plenty of time to make the source avail("reasonable amount of time")
b) making source avail does not mean hosting it to the public [i can enforce an nda (like Realtime Linux), i can make you ask me for it, you must pay the shipping]
c) non release versions do not need to make the source avail at all (only "products" are entiteled for protection at all), and for me it's in question if realbot is based on metamod.

just imagine windows network stack would be O.S. *rofl*

Originally Posted by stefanhendriks

ow, i see. So it is
to learn
he learnt
he has learned

meaning, learned is the 'completed' stage? learnt is "he just has learnt not/to do that"... right?

according to things ive found, you can use both 'learned' and 'learnt' so it doesnt really matter.. (eg he learned/learnt and he has learned/learnt)

Originally Posted by memed

no you are wrong, if a make the binary public i have
a) plenty of time to make the source avail("reasonable amount of time")
b) making source avail does not mean hosting it to the public [i can enforce an nda (like Realtime Linux), i can make you ask me for it, you must pay the shipping]
c) non release versions do not need to make the source avail at all (only "products" are entiteled for protection at all), and for me it's in question if realbot is based on metamod.

just imagine windows network stack would be O.S. *rofl*

sorry but i dont understand what you want to tell me, and im not sure if you understood what i said.. cause i dont see any relation between your post and the text you quoted... i dont care about hosting something and about time, i just said you dont have to support development versions...!?! lol..

[ElGranKemao]

Originally Posted by stefanhendriks

ow, i see. So it is
to learn
he learnt
he has learned

meaning, learned is the 'completed' stage? learnt is "he just has learnt not/to do that"... right?

No Stefan. In fact you can say "He has learnt English", which means that he has taken lessons and eventually passed and exam. And you can say "He is learned in English", and that means that he has a complete -or at least, if not complete, vast-knowlege in English.

So "he learnt" means that someone taught him and he accquired some of the lessons (enough to i.e pass an exam) while "he is learned" involves a profound knowledge in some field.

At least that's how I understand it. Just a subtle and probably useless difference and maybe it isn't worth the explanation :o