Poxbot?? Where's it gone?

[stefanhendriks]

yes something like that I am glad you remember that part of the story apart from the frequent code changes that would force me to update and upload the source so many times i'd be spending more time on uploading then on coding

good work student

I have to thank everyone tremendously for their help with poxbot. I was not aware that I failed to reply to any mail though I on occaission took over a week. All mails sent to zerto@comcast.net I should have responded to. For the first time in six months however I am able to compile poxbot. I lost visual studio and a lot of source code that I hadn't backed up after a crash. After reinstalling visual studio code that once compiled no longer did. I now have a copy of the new 2003 visual studio and I've gotten things to compile once more. If anyone is still interested in poxbot I'll work on finishing a working version over spring break. I'm sorry to all of the people I let down. Also I'll post the source code with it. I had been intending to make it open source once I properly commented some things, but now I just want to finish implementing everything already started so far. Its long past due that some good come from work others beside myself put into poxbot.

[james_isaac]

Yay. I'm interested.

Will it work on 1.6? Because if it will, then that would be amazing . But even if it doesn't, that's still great.

[Whistler]

Originally Posted by Pierre-Marie Baty

the HPB_bot license (GNU) is contaminative

But actually the HPB-bot has NO license at all, no GPL, no BSD...
You just need to give botman a credit and all will be OK (just like what botman said in the readme file)