Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Austin
HELLO!
Any BOT authors listening?
VERSION STAMP YOUR DLLS!
WHAT A NOVEL IDEA!
|
I hear you Austin, I hear you
However this win32-specific version stuff does not suit the version convention scheme I'd like to use. I version stamp most of my files under the form YYYYMMDD[-b] for year, month, day and (optionally) build, such as "version 20040229-2", which tells me the file was the second release built on february 29, 2004. Windows, on the other hand, wants me to version stamp my files like "1.0.0.1" or so. It doesn't represent anything for me...
If you tell me I can keep my version convention scheme with the Windows version stamp resource, I'll add this version stamp resource right away to all of my projects, I swear !