Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre-Marie Baty
Leagle, please do not make personal attacks, even if the person is not a regular member of this forum. Auxois may not be as open minded on certain matters as it would be good one be, but he has reasons, and good ones.
|
He does not have good reasons. He is not being "close minded" he is a bigot and a fool. He has shown this on several occasions. I am not angry because he banned me, (for disagreeing with him reasonably no less) but because he typified his order and proved the points I did not want to make. Also he was too stubborn to even accept that in a country where manual labour is cheap, it is used. Bah! Comparing such circumstances to western business ideas (which I shall tell you now, were flawed) is foolish, as is starting ,(yes, an administrator
starting) a flame war over it is, well, frankly unacceptable.
[edit] I am a forgiving and understanding person, I do not claim to be erudite, but I
do require certain standards. I'd happily share a bottle of vodka with an american, (well, beer, they don't really like their spirits as much) or tea with an arab.
I am fed up with these people who slag off muslims, citing their religeon when the same people spout christian bullshit (This is not an attack on christianity itself, which, like any religeon is terribly flawed) and use it to excuse themselves.
I deleted my 2nd post btw. This is exactly why I try and avoid these discussions. I suppose this is one thing Auxois did well -a seperate forum for "War on terror" stuff specifically, not just offtopic/current affairs.
Perhaps it is something to think about Pierre, if the consensus is to continue discussing such topics. I would not mind lumping it with current affairs however, as the behaviour of this forum is refreshingly good.
Otherwise I do implore people to go to
www.nuclearbox.com where there is a dedicated forum to bigotry, flame wars and general ignorance. (And the occasional intelligent discussion, I'm trying to get you to go there after all

)
[edit] By ignorant I mean
willfully ignorant, as in, choosing to be a fool, not failing to know of the facts/topic/etc. He most definately fits the descriptor of "prat".
I take it doe not function here, it seems to have mangled my link. I guess I am behind the times. (since edited, of course.)
(actually I give up, I can't seem to get the link to work. Whatever, I'm sure you all know where it is anyway, start of the fun and all that. just copy and paste if you don't)