de_aztec waypoints
 

I'm having problems with all the aztec waypoints I have tried so far, my console is spammed for ever with "NO PATH FOUND?"

small example of the error text in the HLServer\ivperror.txt:

Map:de_aztec No Path from 156 to 478!
Map:de_aztec No Path from 403 to 478!
Map:de_aztec No Path from 334 to 478!

Is there a de_aztec.pwf which does not have these problems? It's just Im trying to monitor the server but I cannot see what is going on in my console because of this spamming, I know its not a major problem but I would feel happier if it wasnt doing it.

I realise I could try fixing it myself but I found that Im a bit sh*#e at waypointing :o

TY

BeliLe

Re: de_aztec waypoints
 

So you're using IVPBot, right? But doesn't IVPBot use the same waypoints as old PODBot 2.5 did? And the PB 2.5 waypoint for de_aztec worked fine... ???:(
Or are you on CS 1.6 and they included a changed version of de_aztec?

Re: de_aztec waypoints
 

I'am using IVPBot and yes it does use the same waypints as pod bot, but Aztec was changed in 1.6 so the old waypoints for aztec are wrong. All the new steam Aztec waypoints I have tried spams the console with similar messages.

The changed version does not include the new aztec waypoints.

Re: de_aztec waypoints
 

Hi, try my CS-1.6 Waypoint-Pack.
http://people.freenet.de/3016/coco/cs16-2maps.zip

I just tried my waypoints on aztec again, I get no error-messages with Podbot 2.5/Metamod. I think there is a command that stops the "no path found"-message. And there are other aztec-waypoints from other authors in these forums ;) . And don´t forget to delete your pxp-file, when you try new waypoints.

Re: de_aztec waypoints
 

Thanks CoCoNUT,



I will give you waypoint pack a try, I think I have tried most waypoints now for aztec 8o I always delete all the pxp files when I install a new pwf I know its a bit drastic to delete them all but what the hell its quicker than trying to find the one I want, but thanx for mentioning it.



I will give it a try and report back to say if it was successful and than you again.