.:: Bots United ::.

.:: Bots United ::. (http://forums.bots-united.com/index.php)

- Offtopic (http://forums.bots-united.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23)

- - Books (http://forums.bots-united.com/showthread.php?t=3087)

i must stand apart cause for some reason i hated 1984... probly cause i hate the teacher that made me read it

@ Exilibur: So "aktuel" is the Danish word? Cool, add one "l" and you got the German word... but it's not "actual". "Actual" means something like "real". So when you say "My actual girlfriend is blonde", that means that you got, for example, a brown-haired girl you show to others as your girlfriend - but actually, she isn't your real girlfriend because that blonde girl is... ;) Try "up to date" or "timeless"...

/exit wise guy mode

@ biohazerd87: Yeah, school can spoil every book, no matter how good it is. Talk about anyone who has had to read "The Catcher in the Rye" at school... they'll hate it. I read it myself, and I loved it.
At school, they always make the mistake of overinterpreting everything. They choose a much too academic approach, thus destroying the actual effect that the book would normally have...

Quote:

Originally Posted by >BKA< T Wrecks

well my teacher was just a bitch(as in the servant) like he was like 'oh i am liberal... so anybook i read no matter if it is about dinasors or a picture book of blues clues it is a government conspericy'... and i have nothing aginst liberals...

to sum up my last post... he was nuttier that a shithouse rat:|

ROFL... dude, your spelling rules! :D "Dinasors"... "Conspericy"... It's so off it's almost creative... admit it, you're doing that on perpuss! :P

/me stops being an ass

Seriously: It's pretty much the same: He's got his interpretation - no matter if it something he came up with all alone, or if he read it somewhere in another book... and in most cases, books read at school are taken apart and analyzed into pieces, until nothing is left of them... a relation with a book is a personal relation... you can give hints, and there may be a generally true background, but that background doesn't necessarily matter to you. It's what the book tells you that makes it worth the read, not what others tell the book ought to tell you.
A book in which you found something somebody else advised you to find may be a Pulitzer prize winner and (objectively seen) a great book - but to you, it's worthless. However, a book in which you find something yourself -maybe even without having searched for it- might be an average book speaking in general terms, but for you it can be a treasure.

[QUOTE=>BKA< T Wrecks]ROFL... dude, your spelling rules! :D "Dinasors"... "Conspericy"... It's so off it's almost creative... admit it, you're doing that on perpuss! :P

/me stops being an ass

[QUOTE]

lol... no really i am the worst speller ever... i can read any word and say it correctly but i can't spell at all... infact if there was a contest for the worst speller ever... you guys might as well not enter... i win by default... thats how much i rule at not ruling at spelling

seen on a CS server:
"u 5uCk a7 5p3ll1n6"

wrecks, besides aa much more simple, but totally unexplainable grammar, danish is very similar to german...

Ich kann auch deutch sprechen, jah! Aber nicht so gut, weil ich nur es gehat für drei jahre, und ich habe es nicht gesprächen in zwei jahre. So es gibt viele fegel in diesen text! :D

Pero Estoy estudiando español ahora.

Biohazerd87, If have danish teacher like that... It's terrible... I agree with wrecks (as usual... come on, say something controversial or stupid! :D) on the point that texts should be read and understood at a personal level.