.:: Bots United ::.  
filebase forums discord server github wiki web
cubebot epodbot fritzbot gravebot grogbot hpbbot ivpbot jkbotti joebot
meanmod podbotmm racc rcbot realbot sandbot shrikebot soulfathermaps yapb

Go Back   .:: Bots United ::. > Developer's Farm > General Programming
General Programming Help others and get yourself helped here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol...
Old
  (#1)
markus_heiden
Moderator / E[POD]bot developer
 
markus_heiden's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 66
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hamburg / Germany
Default Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol... - 23-10-2005

Hi folks,

Eclipse does not support the CVSNT sserver protocol as you may have already sadfully noticed. But there is a plugin which adds CVSNT support to Eclipse:

http://home.arcor.de/rolf_wilms/cvsssl/cvsssl_help.html

This plugin has to be extracted to the Eclipse plugin folder directly.

Settings for Eclipse CSV-View with bots-united CVSNT is attached.

Markus
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	settings.jpg
Views:	567
Size:	40.0 KB
ID:	760  
  
Reply With Quote
Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol...
Old
  (#2)
Rick
Council Member
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 690
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Holland
Default Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol... - 23-10-2005

Nice
Does it need cvnt externally or has it code for sserver build in?
  
Reply With Quote
Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol...
Old
  (#3)
Pierre-Marie Baty
Roi de France
 
Pierre-Marie Baty's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,049
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 46°43'60N 0°43'0W 0.187A
Default Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol... - 24-10-2005

I wonder when sserver will become the official CVS protocol...



RACC home - Bots-United: beer, babies & bots (especially the latter)
"Learn to think by yourself, else others will do it for you."
  
Reply With Quote
Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol...
Old
  (#4)
Rick
Council Member
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 690
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Holland
Default Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol... - 24-10-2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre-Marie Baty
I wonder when sserver will become the official CVS protocol...
Never I think. AFAIK work on CVS is kinda stopped. I believe some CVS developers work on Subversion now.

Ugh...and whats so good about sserver? I think only CVSNT supports it, which...isn't my favourite piece of software
  
Reply With Quote
Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol...
Old
  (#5)
Pierre-Marie Baty
Roi de France
 
Pierre-Marie Baty's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,049
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 46°43'60N 0°43'0W 0.187A
Default Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol... - 25-10-2005

Weird guys. How can you possibly stop working on something that's become the standard de facto in the industry for concurrent source code versioning to develop an alternative system that no one knows ? Makes little sense for me.

Anyway, nice thing Markus... too bad I don't use Eclipse No problem with your account, by the way ?



RACC home - Bots-United: beer, babies & bots (especially the latter)
"Learn to think by yourself, else others will do it for you."
  
Reply With Quote
Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol...
Old
  (#6)
Rick
Council Member
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 690
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Holland
Default Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol... - 25-10-2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre-Marie Baty
Weird guys. How can you possibly stop working on something that's become the standard de facto in the industry for concurrent source code versioning to develop an alternative system that no one knows ? Makes little sense for me.
Hmm seems I was wrong: http://ximbiot.com/cvs/wiki/index.ph...Current_events
Some recent updates there...

My guess is that just a few CVS guys started their own project. Oh and SVN is fairly known (in the OS community atleast). The KDE team even switched to it from cvs and I use it for my new project
  
Reply With Quote
Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol...
Old
  (#7)
markus_heiden
Moderator / E[POD]bot developer
 
markus_heiden's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 66
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hamburg / Germany
Default Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol... - 26-10-2005

My account works fine, thanks!

Cvsnt is not needed for the plugin.

Subversion is becomming THE state of the art versioning system, because it don't has the many weaknesses of cvs: e.g. subversion has an api and it has atomic commit, so you can see which files have been changed by each commit and many more. Yet, it is not as easy as with cvs to set a server up, but it is already as easy to use as cvs.

Markus
  
Reply With Quote
Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol...
Old
  (#8)
Rick
Council Member
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 690
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Holland
Default Re: Eclipse vs. CVSNT sserver protocol... - 27-10-2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by markus_heiden
Cvsnt is not needed for the plugin.
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by markus_heiden
Subversion is becomming THE state of the art versioning system, because it don't has the many weaknesses of cvs: e.g. subversion has an api and it has atomic commit, so you can see which files have been changed by each commit and many more. Yet, it is not as easy as with cvs to set a server up, but it is already as easy to use as cvs.
Markus
Agreed
Its much faster as well, also for some reason it feels 'less hacky' than CVS.

A downside is, that the .svn directories seem to be bigger than their .CVS counterparts.
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com