.:: Bots United ::.  
filebase forums discord server github wiki web
cubebot epodbot fritzbot gravebot grogbot hpbbot ivpbot jkbotti joebot
meanmod podbotmm racc rcbot realbot sandbot shrikebot soulfathermaps yapb

Go Back   .:: Bots United ::. > Developer's Farm > General Bot Coding
General Bot Coding See what a pain it is to get those little mechs shooting around

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Re: United Bot
Old
  (#31)
Onno Kreuzinger
aka: memed / Server Admin
 
Onno Kreuzinger's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 705
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: germany
Default Re: United Bot - 16-03-2004

this is the way you start a wiki:

klick on the question mark [and register/choose a username when ist's the first time],
then you can edit that wiki link. each word written like this WikiWordToBeEdited will become a wiki link, and until someone edit's it, it's grey with a question mark.
kick on the question mark to edit.

that it, there are no dead links, they are simply not yet filled :-)

p.s. the login is in the lower right corner, and you name must be a WikiWord, like OnnoKreuzinger, or PeterPan or BadBoy. this name is some kind of nick, w/o any special meaning, but it makes sense to see who wrote what.

p.p.s. some links to explain it broader:

how to add pages:
http://server.bots-united.com/wiki/i...hp/AddingPages


sunny morning view from my balcony:

see our WIKI!
see our filebase!

Last edited by Onno Kreuzinger; 16-03-2004 at 12:08..
  
Reply With Quote
Re: United Bot
Old
  (#32)
Terran
Member
 
Terran's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 431
Join Date: Jan 2004
Default Re: United Bot - 16-03-2004

About the DOCTYPE issue:
IE expects the DOCTYPE declaration only in the first line of document, nowhere else.

@memed:
In one of the last issues of the c't the was an article about how different browsers/versions handle those DOCTYPEs...
  
Reply With Quote
Re: United Bot
Old
  (#33)
Onno Kreuzinger
aka: memed / Server Admin
 
Onno Kreuzinger's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 705
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: germany
Default Re: United Bot - 16-03-2004

yes, that fits my explanation, IE concanated the first document with the second, thus having the doctype not in the first line. anyways, a refresh should read a new document und not mess them up ...


cheers


sunny morning view from my balcony:

see our WIKI!
see our filebase!

Last edited by Onno Kreuzinger; 16-03-2004 at 18:37..
  
Reply With Quote
Re: United Bot
Old
  (#34)
Terran
Member
 
Terran's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 431
Join Date: Jan 2004
Default Re: United Bot - 16-03-2004

I'm not sure but maybe the reason for this is using "1" instead of "0" as parameter to the "content" argument in
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1; URL=/wiki">.
  
Reply With Quote
Re: United Bot
Old
  (#35)
Onno Kreuzinger
aka: memed / Server Admin
 
Onno Kreuzinger's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 705
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: germany
Default Re: United Bot - 16-03-2004

no, i just stoped editing the html file after the refresh meta tag, so no
Code:
</head>
and no body at all, both illegal html, but i wonder why that I.E. puts two different html files together, i expect that to cause security problems (i.e. context of the first page accessed while also loading and executing the second file and its scripts). maybe, maybe not anyone interessted to test 9_9

with mozilla that html worked as expected, and opera seems to work too, with broken html files.thats why i did not finish the first html at all. *g* im too busy in too many things at once.

b.t.w.
the value 0 indicates only to wait 0 seconds, thats a perfectly legal value. (selfhtml can be quite usefull)

oh and THX for thinking along (mitdenken), i just read your glibc2.3 debian thread


sunny morning view from my balcony:

see our WIKI!
see our filebase!

Last edited by Onno Kreuzinger; 16-03-2004 at 18:47..
  
Reply With Quote
Re: United Bot
Old
  (#36)
Terran
Member
 
Terran's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 431
Join Date: Jan 2004
Default Re: United Bot - 17-03-2004

Quote:
Originally Posted by memed
no, i just stoped editing the html file after the refresh meta tag, so no
Code:
</head>
and no body at all, both illegal html, but i wonder why that I.E. puts two different html files together, i expect that to cause security problems (i.e. context of the first page accessed while also loading and executing the second file and its scripts).
I stopped wondering about IE a loooooong time ago .
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com