I've read up a bit on it. Everybody ended up voting no, because there were too many contradictory opinions, and it was decided to reject it instead of having series of later amendments that would compromise the spirit of the text. But initially, half the voters were rather pro than con.
Let's see now if they don't try to sneak a similar law around while we're not watching them
RACC home - Bots-United: beer, babies & bots (especially the latter) "Learn to think by yourself, else others will do it for you."