Open-Source , how to handle?

Originally Posted by Onno Kreuzinger

omg, read my post, " ... the bot build pak's...in our filebase...allow anyone to compile.. this bot.."
/hint the link to the filebase is in my sig and in the upper right corner/
(the build pack includes the neede files of hlsdk and the sources of metamod)

jo... schulligung!
must have overlooked it.
i'll lower my head in shame...

Best Bytes®,
Harry

[Onno Kreuzinger]

*g* what a nice ending for this thread,
we all just love bots don't we

[MusicMan]

Originally Posted by Nova

Are you an Aussie ? Coz the mate sounds like it. If yes, whereabouts in OZ r u from, coz im down here at the moment.

Regards,
Seb

No, I am sorry but I am not , I would have liked to meet you if I was down there though
I am Danish, I just love to say mate alot

MAN! i got it compiled...

i'd never compiled a dll before... how should
i know i had to use the dllwrap program?
i used gcc 2.95.3-8 (from http://mingw.org)
and adapted the makefile...
it compiled like a charm!

thanx again for your excellent work!
Best Bytes®,
Harry

You know, the 2.95 GCC is really old, really standards uncompliant, and really just plain bad.

Don't they have a MinGW based on the GCC 3.x series? I thought they did...although I'd love to setup GCC 3.4 on Windows. Sort of. I'm rather fond of my Visual Studio, actually

Originally Posted by PsychicX

You know, the 2.95 GCC is really old, really standards uncompliant, and really just plain bad.

Don't they have a MinGW based on the GCC 3.x series? I thought they did...although I'd love to setup GCC 3.4 on Windows. Sort of. I'm rather fond of my Visual Studio, actually

that was just a coincidence...
i had to fiddle so much; and first time i compiled it
correctly just happened to be with 2.95.3-8.
(i also have 3.2.x and 3.3.x)
do you think the code is gonna be hell faster recompiled
with 3.x?

hmmm.. to your CTs get out of the fridge in de_rats?
do they climb ladders now?
(build is 3043)
sorry... i'm getting too far OT

Best Bytes®,
Harry

[Onno Kreuzinger]

Originally Posted by PsychicX

You know, the 2.95 GCC is really old, really standards uncompliant, and really just plain bad.

Don't they have a MinGW based on the GCC 3.x series? I thought they did...although I'd love to setup GCC 3.4 on Windows. Sort of. I'm rather fond of my Visual Studio, actually

you are aware that gcc 2.95 is the compiler user for the kernel ? i think it does not meet the newest ISO C(C++ guidelines, but that is ok, is was developed bofore the newer guidelines came out. and as fas as linux is concerned, it the compiler to use if you do not have a 9.x distro. At least when it comes to stability and portability.

@Hacker Harry could you please share your modified files with us, so that the next one does not have to figure it all out himself again?
Thx

cheers Onno

Originally Posted by Onno Kreuzinger

[...]
@Hacker Harry could you please share your modified files with us, so that the next one does not have to figure it all out himself again?
[...]

no problem...
shall i dump my Makefile into this thread?
or upload it somewhere else?

Best Bytes®,
Harry

[Onno Kreuzinger]

just zip and attach here, preferably with some sort of (minimalistic) guide to tell how to use it.
i will test it and put it in the CVS, in that case it will become part of the next release.

cheers Onno

Originally Posted by Onno Kreuzinger

just zip and attach here, preferably with some sort of (minimalistic) guide to tell how to use it.
i will test it and put it in the CVS, in that case it will become part of the next release.

cheers Onno

Affirmative

i've added a few comment lines that should suffice...

Best Bytes®,
Harry