Who's who

[Cpl. Shrike]

Im pro.
I voted the on the minimal post count thingy.
Although it doesn't have to be a post count limit. But there has to be some restriction.
I just want it to be used usefully.
If there's all kinda funny things or just titles at random it doesn't help much.
Then it just an extended signature / avatar option. 9_9

[Pierre-Marie Baty]

Still lacking the vote of 3 council members... (aspirin, nova, botmeister)

[@$3.1415rin]

50 posts minumin sounds fine to me

[stefanhendriks]

50 posts is ok with me, i have no problems with that.

[Pierre-Marie Baty]

then it's validated.

Watch out for the mess

[stefanhendriks]

lol, well i actually said it was ok before. But i did not state the 50 post count. So i thought of re-approve this proposal.

Yay, now we mods really can get to work

[KWo]

I may attest - this limitation with at least 50 posts doesn't work. I know one member with about 21 posts who just changed his title.

[von Ryan]

LOL @ HangFire's title

[MarD]

Heyyo,

Striking good idea, I say we do it after a certain amount of posts to prevent forum trolls from making it a bad idea.

[stefanhendriks]

too bad the title is limited to a few characters only?

maybe change:

char title[25];

into:

char title[125];

??