wiki and math

[KWo]

Originally Posted by koraX

less talking and more contributing :p

Agree 100%. Instead useless quarrels (on which You, guys, lose power and Your costly time) maybe try to concentrate at something more effective and productive - this what You know the best - coding.
I don't want this forum will change the profil to only theoretical discussion "what is better and how better implement something in code and which way".
Working (alive) examples are driving people much better than even 10 pages theoretical explanation in wiki or elsewhere. I guess this topic should be closed. It's my opinion. 9_9

[@$3.1415rin]

bah, "less talking and more contributing" and not having added much by themselves ...

but of course you are right

[The Storm]

I too don't understand this math ( I'm to young ). But Aspirin you don't want this to be copy and pastle. Ok then you can write all this stuff in C++ code but not with pBot-> ect. just with the characters "c,b,y,f" ot some simple word with much comments. After that the coders can inderstand this functions better and change it with the right stuff.

[@$3.1415rin]

I have added some stuff yesterday, e.g. how you calculate the different lengths explicitly. and for most stuff on the geometry stuff you just need to know what a dotproduct is. so you can almost copy it.

[Zacker]

I think its fine that the math stuff is there, even though I don't understand it. My limited knowledge should not limit others from learning it.