Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pierre-Marie Baty
Ideally AIM_OFFSET should be removed, for the very reason sPlOrYgOn says, because it is not a human-like way of aiming.
|
OK - I'm agree with You - this is not 100% human-like, but for this moment we have nothing for replacement. This algorithm You said above - first must to be good described (at least like the description of this A* pathfinder made - if I remember good - by aspirin) , next implemented, next released in some beta and tested and at the end released in some official version. But:
1. Is this algorithm realy known so good by coders?
2. Is sPlOrYgOn actually ready to implement it?
3. If 2 is not - have You a time to help him (with all needed by him explanation and maybe with preparing some parts of code by You)?
The change from AIM_OFFSET to this new algorithm should be continuous - don't remove this AIM_OFFSET from actual code until this new algorithm will be 100% OK. For this new algorithm sPlOrYgOn can add a new cvar (ignoring AIM_OFFSET and use for tests new algorithm - if this cvar is on). After AIM_OFFSET and this cvar should be removed.
Is this a good solution now?