actually i got the feeling KWo you do not read my post entirely. I reacted on several cases, and all i get is examples where you find the rules are vague, or where the mods/council members do not do their job properly.
Let me react to your examples:
1st example; read below
2nd example; legit
1st example is this fine line where you can argue till death wether the reaction was appropiate or not. Actually the last post was a nice 'explanation'
Quote:
In addition to that, this is NOT disputable. The rules are in place for a very good reason. And because there is always mistakes, it has only been a warning.
This topic is hereby closed.
|
Especially the 2nd sentence... its 'only' a warning.
The first example was perfectly legit, though asp doubts, this forum is not for illegal activities as starting DOS attacks, so a warning is justified.
My question to you is KWo, why do you need to nitpick on every case while i do not hear a single member about it? There have been several cases with (3)Colors, you're not gonna reinvestigate them as well?
Still awaiting response from my other post.