[>BKA< T Wrecks]

Just dropping by to let you know I'm still interested in this... just that I ndon't have much time.

@ sPlO: I agree with all points, but let's not start that compatibility discussion again, ok? I think we can all agree that...

using PB mm waypoints for PB mm is better than using PB 2.5 waypoints and

using PB 2.5 waypoints for PB 2.5 is better than using PB mm waypoints,

whereas it doesn't matter if you use EPB or PB 2.5 waypoints for EPB or PB 2.5

- no matter because of which technical detail that might be.

The division is not intended for any other thing than to help people choose the ideal solution for them, period. We can still place a note somewhere that you can use e.g. PB mm for PB 2.5 because they are compatible in a technical sense, although not ideal.

@ biohazerd: The template doesn't look bad, and the functionality is just as I had imagined it to be (well, as far as that can be judged at such an early stage of development). Oh, and is it me or is that blue a bit "baby/candy blue"-ish?

At the end of the day, the font size will have to be smaller, I'd get rid of the broad divisions between table cells and go for the "thin horizontal line" or "zebra stripes" look. But that can be adjusted...