[stefanhendriks]

I think RACC would eventually not even need nav data from us, as his bots are capable of learning maps more quickly then bots plotting nodes. Actually, RACC should know what surfaces are walkable already, it just needs some confirmation for that. That would mean, only 1 round to play and you already have data to play with.

I see why it is difficult to port navmesh to nodes and vice-versa, so i think we should focus on this standard format? Do we agree on the following format?

; A walkable vector
[VECTOR]
x=xxxx.xxxx
y=yyyy.yyyy
z=zzzz.zzzz
; flags , if needed, to tell if its ladder, water, air, etc
; seperated with each 'flag word' so we do not use
; comma seperated stuff (yuk!)
flag=AIR
flag=LADDER
 
; new vector..
[VECTOR]
...