.:: Bots United ::. - View Single Post - Portable, self-contained replacements for RANDOM_STUFF()

Bert · **Re: Portable, self-contained replacements for RANDOM_STUFF() -** 08-01-2004

This may sound stupid, but should I set the seed more than once to ensure a more random result, or is setting it once enough (as in the numbers are random enough)?

	(#18)
Bert Member Status: Offline Posts: 11 Join Date: Jan 2004	Re: Portable, self-contained replacements for RANDOM_STUFF() - 08-01-2004 This may sound stupid, but should I set the seed more than once to ensure a more random result, or is setting it once enough (as in the numbers are random enough)?