.:: Bots United ::. - View Single Post

sPlOrYgOn · **Re: current Sourcecode -** 31-05-2004

well I found out == does have a higher precedence..
so it would check if (1 << CS_WEAPON_GRENADE) is equal to 0 then AND it with pEdict->v.weapons..
I added parenthesis around so it looks like this:
((pEdict->v.weapons & (1<< CS_WEAPON_GRENADE)) == 0)

and you said knowing anything other than operator precedence is a waste...
meaning if someone knew about everything else except for operator precedence it is a waste meaning everyone must know all about operator precedence or it is a waste..

[edit]
I just copied the operator precedence table out of "The C++ Programming Language: Special Edition" for an easier reference

http://www.mapzap.org/op.html
[/edit]

	(#5)
sPlOrYgOn <-- He did it. Status: Offline Posts: 1,558 Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Los Angeles, California, USA, North America, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way.	Re: current Sourcecode - 31-05-2004 well I found out == does have a higher precedence.. so it would check if (1 << CS_WEAPON_GRENADE) is equal to 0 then AND it with pEdict->v.weapons.. I added parenthesis around so it looks like this: ((pEdict->v.weapons & (1<< CS_WEAPON_GRENADE)) == 0) and you said knowing anything other than operator precedence is a waste... meaning if someone knew about everything else except for operator precedence it is a waste meaning everyone must know all about operator precedence or it is a waste.. [edit] I just copied the operator precedence table out of "The C++ Programming Language: Special Edition" for an easier reference http://www.mapzap.org/op.html [/edit] splorygon Last edited by sPlOrYgOn; 31-05-2004 at 19:08..