.:: Bots United ::.

.:: Bots United ::. (http://forums.bots-united.com/index.php)
-   The Agora (http://forums.bots-united.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   Server Maintanance - August 2005 (http://forums.bots-united.com/showthread.php?t=4357)

Nova 16-08-2005 16:46

Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Hello Folks.

Im plan on doing server maintanance on the weekend from the 19th to the 21st of August, including kernel update, opensshupdate and a few security changes:

- php_safe mode on
- hardened php
- hardened userlevel
- chrooted home directories for everyone
- NO root login, ONLY sudo execution

Additionally, there will be a few other changes.

JUST A NOTICE BEFOREHAND, EXPECT DOWNTIME OF ALL NONESSENTIAL SERVICES (Gameservers, CVS, etc).

All major services will be routed thru server-one (my box) during this time, so the downtime should be kept to a minimum, and all ESSENTIAL services (http, mail, database) will be operational (hopefully)

Do I have council approval ?

Nova 8)

@$3.1415rin 16-08-2005 16:52

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
approved, nigga :D

see ya on octoberfest :P

Pierre-Marie Baty 16-08-2005 16:58

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
8o oh my god

Is it really necessary ? There ought to be immense benefits for everybody if you plan to do so else I don't really see why we should take such a risk !

Nova 16-08-2005 17:04

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
risk ? what risk ?
  • kernel update = formaility, if it doesnt work i can boot recue system
  • openssh update = necessary, quite a lot of security updates out
  • chrooted user directory = worst it could do is lock a few people out of the ftp for a while
  • services update = good idea in general
  • php safe mode and hardening = GOOD idea in general, i just hadnt gotten around to it yet
  • sudo and sudoers = once its setup, its VERY VERY usefull.
imo thos is low risk high gain server surgery, and you dont have to do a thing ... :D

KWo 16-08-2005 17:14

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Don't You think guys the server is too much times updated? Everytime (every update I mean) after the update we got a lot of troubles (including additional downtime, not working for a while some services they were working before update etc.).
Instead inceasing the security by instantly update the server (if any new software appears for it), maybe just focus on making good backups of the server to get it back to work if someone really destroy it (because it is not 100% safe because of not installed some new stuff). I guess restoring the server from the backup is less troubles and shorter down-time than all down-times we need for every update.
I'm not any expert of servers, so I can't say You "do it - it's good" - or "don't do it - it's bad", but having some experience browsing other forums I may attest - our forum has the longest down-times from all I'm browsing. Dunno - other admins (of other forums) probably don't care so much for every update and their servers aren't attacked so often (I really don't remember any bigger down-time of other forum because got attcked/hacked), but - as the most important fro me - they just work.

"Something better is always an enemy of something good".

That's my opinion.

Nova 16-08-2005 17:42

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Well, the last update was kind of interrupted, and i left a lot of things unfinished, this is a package listing for the update, with the important one's bold:

[ebuild U ] sys-apps/man-1.6-r1 [1.6]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/man-pages-2.07 [2.05]
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/zlib-1.2.3 [1.2.2]
[ebuild U ] dev-db/mysql-4.0.25-r2 [4.0.24-r1]
[ebuild U ] sys-auth/pam_mysql-0.6.0 [0.5]
[ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-3.0-r12 [3.0-r11]
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.12-r2 [1.3.11-r3]
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.3.5-r1 [2.3.5]
[ebuild U ] media-sound/mpg123-0.59s-r10 [0.59s-r9]
[ebuild U ] net-misc/asterisk-1.0.9 [1.0.8]
[ebuild U ] app-arch/sharutils-4.5 [4.2.1-r11]
[ebuild U ] mail-filter/razor-2.77 [2.74]
[ebuild U ] net-nds/openldap-2.2.27-r1 [2.2.26-r2]
[ebuild U ] net-misc/openssh-4.1_p1-r1 [3.9_p1]
[ebuild U ] app-editors/nano-1.3.8 [1.3.7]
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/automake-1.9.6 [1.8.0]
[ebuild U ] mail-client/mutt-1.5.9 [1.5.8-r2]
[ebuild U ] net-misc/wget-1.10 [1.9.1-r5]
[ebuild U ] net-dns/bind-9.3.1-r3 [9.2.5-r4]
[ebuild U ] media-libs/tiff-3.7.3 [3.7.2]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libxml2-2.6.20-r2 [2.6.19]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.14-r2 [1.1.13-r1]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/file-4.14 [4.13]
[ebuild U ] media-libs/freetype-2.1.10 [2.1.9-r1]
[ebuild U ] app-arch/bzip2-1.0.3-r5 [1.0.3-r4]
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/gpm-1.20.1-r5 [1.20.1-r4]
[ebuild U ] app-text/aspell-0.60.3 [0.60.2]
[ebuild U ] net-analyzer/net-snmp-5.2.1.2 [5.2.1-r1]
[ebuild U ] dev-php/php-4.4.0 [4.1.0_rc2]
[ebuild U ] app-arch/gzip-1.3.5-r8 [1.3.5-r7]
[ebuild U ] net-libs/courier-authlib-0.57 [0.55.20050320]
[ebuild U ] net-mail/courier-imap-4.0.4 [4.0.1-r2]
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper-3.1 [3-r1]
[ebuild U ] net-ftp/ncftp-3.1.9 [3.1.8-r1]
[ebuild U ] dev-util/dialog-1.0.20050306 [1.0.20050206]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/debianutils-2.14.1-r1 [2.13.2]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/sandbox-1.2.12 [1.2.9]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22-r2 [2.0.51.22-r1]
[ebuild U ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.5 [0.2.4]
[ebuild U ] dev-util/pkgconfig-0.18.1-r1 [0.17.2-r1]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libpcre-6.1 [5.0]
[ebuild U ] net-analyzer/nmap-3.83 [3.81]
[ebuild U ] mail-filter/dspam-3.4.9 [3.4.8]
[ebuild U ] net-www/apache-2.0.54-r13 [2.0.54-r11]
[ebuild NS ] dev-php/mod_php-4.4.0-r1

[ebuild U ] net-misc/ntp-4.2.0.20050303 [4.2.0.20040617-r2]
[ebuild U ] net-dns/libidn-0.5.18 [0.5.17]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/gmp-4.1.4-r1 [4.1.4]
[ebuild U ] app-antivirus/clamav-0.86.2 [0.86.1]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/iproute2-2.6.11.20050330 [2.6.11.20050310-r1]
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/com_err-1.38 [1.37]
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/ss-1.38 [1.37]
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.38 [1.37-r1]
[ebuild U ] app-editors/vim-core-6.3.084-r2 [6.3.075]
[ebuild U ] app-editors/vim-6.3.084 [6.3.075]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.2_pre7-r1 [3.2_pre7]
[ebuild U ] net-www/mod_auth_mysql-3.0.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] net-ftp/ftp-0.17-r5 [0.17-r4]
[ebuild U ] net-dns/c-ares-1.2.1-r1 [1.2.1]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/shadow-4.0.11.1-r2 [4.0.7-r2]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/pam-login-4.0.11.1-r2 [3.17]
[ebuild U ] dev-util/subversion-1.2.1 [1.2.0]
[ebuild U ] app-admin/sudo-1.6.8_p9-r2 [1.6.8_p9-r1]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r1 [2.86]
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.0_pre5 [1.11.12-r4]
[ebuild U ] net-dns/bind-tools-9.3.1 [9.2.5]
[ebuild U ] sys-process/fcron-2.9.7 [2.9.6]
[ebuild U ] sys-boot/grub-0.96-r3 [0.96-r2]
[ebuild U ] net-misc/rsync-2.6.6 [2.6.5]
[ebuild U ] net-firewall/iptables-1.3.2 [1.3.1-r4]
[ebuild U ] app-antivirus/f-prot-4.6.0-r1 [3.5.4-r1]

Cpl. Shrike 16-08-2005 18:28

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
I love server updates ;)

Nova 16-08-2005 19:03

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
same :D

Rick 16-08-2005 19:49

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
I love gentoo


(and fbsd)

The Storm 17-08-2005 00:34

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
I love Rick. :P:P:P:P:P:P
Hahahahahahaah. :D:D:D

Nova 17-08-2005 00:34

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
gentoo is the love1111!!!!@!oneoneonelolpwned :D

The Storm 17-08-2005 00:37

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Update mania = Crash the server. :P:D

Rick 17-08-2005 01:04

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by THE_STORM
I love Rick. :P:P:P:P:P:P
Hahahahahahaah. :D:D:D

/me blocks THE_STORM from ICQ :|

Pierre-Marie Baty 17-08-2005 02:06

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
this is getting outta hand but I sorta agree with KWo

What you could do would be to download a dump of the server's filesystem to a local machine of yours, take the time to do the updates there, and test EVERYTHING on it.

Did we get hacked once ?

Rick 17-08-2005 12:11

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre-Marie Baty
this is getting outta hand but I sorta agree with KWo

What you could do would be to download a dump of the server's filesystem to a local machine of yours, take the time to do the updates there, and test EVERYTHING on it.

Sounds like a good idea. Or start with the updates which doesn't affect much(ie the ones that Nova didn't made bold).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre-Marie Baty
Did we get hacked once ?

Well...BU isn't that populair :) But gentoo is pretty minimal(for linux) so that may help too.

The Storm 17-08-2005 13:04

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick
/me blocks THE_STORM from ICQ :|

Just a joke. Don't be so angry. :|

stefanhendriks 17-08-2005 14:13

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
if it has to be done, it has to be done. Critical updates that is. For all other stuff, i don't see a real reason. If we are 'so small', there is no real benefit in gettin as secured as the Pentagon itself.:)

Onno Kreuzinger 17-08-2005 15:16

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
hrhrhrhr, i'm on holidays folks

good look and may the emerge be with you :)

Thanks for the birthday whishes everyone *G*

sPlOrYgOn 18-08-2005 01:59

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Can we update GCC? Dethpod has been able to make .so files for me nearly half the size of the ones I generate on the BU server using the same makefile..

Pierre-Marie Baty 18-08-2005 03:42

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
That's probably because he strips the debug symbols, not because of GCC itself.

man strip :)

Nova 18-08-2005 10:39

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Sooner or later, the update is gonna HAVE to be done. And i'd rather have it sooner, while im still jobless and have the TIME to immediately correct any problems that arise ...

Seb

mirv 19-08-2005 11:26

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
well if critical updates should be done, why not fix a few other things while you're at it? And remember - if it's not broke, it doesn't have enough features.

sPlOrYgOn 20-08-2005 01:47

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
@PMB: he said he just runs the makefile.. he doesn't even know what strip is.. even though strip does take off 300kB from the ones I've made..

Nova 24-08-2005 13:23

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Server Update Finished. No major problems anticipated / encountered.

let me know if anything goes haywire.

Seb

KWo 24-08-2005 14:04

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
Is this really done everything now? I got the email message like so:

Quote:

Originally Posted by webmaster@bots-united.com
Hello KWo

Please expect bots-united downtime over the next weekend due to server maintanance.

Regards,
Nova @ Bots-United
Council Member

PS: you are receiving this email because the adress (my email address) is registered @ bots-united. If you no longer wish to receive emails from b-u, please have us delete your account.

So - will be any downtime during the next weekend or not?
Or it was just Nova joking with me (because of my opinion about updating the server)? ;)

TruB 24-08-2005 15:20

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
got that too..

@$3.1415rin 24-08-2005 15:37

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
nice work nova, no downtime seen :D

Nova 24-08-2005 17:01

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
See, wasnt that bad was it :D

Pierre-Marie Baty 26-08-2005 02:24

Re: Server Maintanance - August 2005
 
I feel like a virgin raped in her sleep :|

nah :D good job Nova


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.