.:: Bots United ::.

.:: Bots United ::. (http://forums.bots-united.com/index.php)
-   General Bot Coding (http://forums.bots-united.com/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   United Bot (http://forums.bots-united.com/showthread.php?t=519)

Onno Kreuzinger 16-03-2004 10:43

Re: United Bot
 
this is the way you start a wiki:

klick on the question mark [and register/choose a username when ist's the first time],
then you can edit that wiki link. each word written like this WikiWordToBeEdited will become a wiki link, and until someone edit's it, it's grey with a question mark.
kick on the question mark to edit.

that it, there are no dead links, they are simply not yet filled :-)

p.s. the login is in the lower right corner, and you name must be a WikiWord, like OnnoKreuzinger, or PeterPan or BadBoy. this name is some kind of nick, w/o any special meaning, but it makes sense to see who wrote what.

p.p.s. some links to explain it broader:

how to add pages:
http://server.bots-united.com/wiki/i...hp/AddingPages

Terran 16-03-2004 11:41

Re: United Bot
 
About the DOCTYPE issue:
IE expects the DOCTYPE declaration only in the first line of document, nowhere else.

@memed:
In one of the last issues of the c't the was an article about how different browsers/versions handle those DOCTYPEs...

Onno Kreuzinger 16-03-2004 12:24

Re: United Bot
 
yes, that fits my explanation, IE concanated the first document with the second, thus having the doctype not in the first line. anyways, a refresh should read a new document und not mess them up ...


cheers

Terran 16-03-2004 13:08

Re: United Bot
 
I'm not sure but maybe the reason for this is using "1" instead of "0" as parameter to the "content" argument in
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1; URL=/wiki">.

Onno Kreuzinger 16-03-2004 17:36

Re: United Bot
 
no, i just stoped editing the html file after the refresh meta tag, so no
Code:

</head>
and no body at all, both illegal html, but i wonder why that I.E. puts two different html files together, i expect that to cause security problems (i.e. context of the first page accessed while also loading and executing the second file and its scripts). maybe, maybe not anyone interessted to test 9_9

with mozilla that html worked as expected, and opera seems to work too, with broken html files.thats why i did not finish the first html at all. *g* im too busy in too many things at once.

b.t.w.
the value 0 indicates only to wait 0 seconds, thats a perfectly legal value. (selfhtml can be quite usefull)

oh and THX for thinking along (mitdenken), i just read your glibc2.3 debian thread

Terran 17-03-2004 08:52

Re: United Bot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by memed
no, i just stoped editing the html file after the refresh meta tag, so no
Code:

</head>
and no body at all, both illegal html, but i wonder why that I.E. puts two different html files together, i expect that to cause security problems (i.e. context of the first page accessed while also loading and executing the second file and its scripts).

I stopped wondering about IE a loooooong time ago :P.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:22.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.