Re: Who's who
 

Im pro.
I voted the on the minimal post count thingy.
Although it doesn't have to be a post count limit. But there has to be some restriction.
I just want it to be used usefully.
If there's all kinda funny things or just titles at random it doesn't help much.
Then it just an extended signature / avatar option. 9_9

Re: Who's who
 

Still lacking the vote of 3 council members... (aspirin, nova, botmeister)

Re: Who's who
 

50 posts minumin sounds fine to me

Re: Who's who
 

50 posts is ok with me, i have no problems with that.

Re: Who's who
 

then it's validated.

Watch out for the mess :)

Re: Who's who
 

lol, well i actually said it was ok before. But i did not state the 50 post count. So i thought of re-approve this proposal.

Yay, now we mods really can get to work :P

Re: Who's who
 

I may attest - this limitation with at least 50 posts doesn't work. I know one member with about 21 posts who just changed his title. :D

Re: Who's who
 

LOL @ HangFire's title :D

Re: Who's who
 

Heyyo,

Striking good idea, I say we do it after a certain amount of posts to prevent forum trolls from making it a bad idea. ;)

Re: Who's who
 

too bad the title is limited to a few characters only?

maybe change:

char title[25];

into:

char title[125];

?? :P